Stop it, stop it stop it.
Snopes.com: Go there before you add my e-mail address to that forward list.
Who goes there? Please leave comments so (An Aries Knows)!
On November 5, 2009, a mass shooting took place at Fort Hood, near Killeen, Texas, when a U.S. Army major/psychiatrist fatally shot 13 people and injured more than 30 others. Weapons used were a FN Five-seven pistol and a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum revolver.
Those killed were:
• Michael Grant Cahill (age 62)
• Libardo Eduardo Caraveo (52)
• Justin Michael DeCrow (32)
• John P. Gaffaney (56)
• Frederick Greene (29)
• Jason Dean Hunt (22)
• Amy Sue Krueger (29)
• Aaron Thomas Nemelka (19)
• Michael S. Pearson (22)
• Russell Gilbert Seager (51)
• Francheska Velez (21)
• Juanita L. Warman (55)
• Kham See Xiong (23)
The wounded were:
James Armstrong
Patrick Blue III
Keara Bono Torkelson
Logan M. Burnett
Alan Carroll
Dorothy Carskadon, permanently disabled
Joy Clark
Matthew D. Cooke
Chad Davis
Mick Engnehl
Joseph T. Foster
Amber Gadlin
Nathan Hewitt
Alvin Howard
Najee M. Hull
Eric Williams Jackson
Justin T. Johnson
Alonzo M. Lunsford, Jr.
Shawn N. Manning
Paul Martin
Brandy Mason
Grant Moxon
Kimberly Munley
John Pagel
Dayna Ferguson Roscoe
Christopher H. Royal; started a nonprofit foundation called “32 Still Standing” to raise money to support the survivors
Randy Royer
Jonathan Sims
George O. Stratton, III
Patrick Zeigler
Miguel A. Valdivia
Thuan Nguyen
A little more than three years ago, I went to my first Jewish wedding. Although it was fascinating to see rituals I’d never seen, hear prayers I’d never heard, and experience new concepts such as the chuppah, the ketubah, the breaking of the glass, and the yichud room, the best part was that it was one of those weddings. The kind where, as a guest, you can see that this is a marriage of two people who truly love each other in a way that promises a lifelong relationship. The rabbi had known the bride since she was a little girl, and he’d understood the first time he met her beloved that this was “the one.” Their parents looked on with utter joy and pride during the ceremony. Afterward, families and friends mingled. People met for the first time, or got reacquainted, over the meal at the reception. There was dancing. Storytelling. Raucous laughter. Quiet moments when everyone felt bathed in the happiness of the couple and all those who loved them. It was magic, that night in 2006, and I left the reception with renewed appreciation for the way romantic love helps the rest of us feel a little more hope, a little more charity, a little more faith.
Love builds us as a community. One manifestation was how, the next day, while the couple was flying to Jamaica for their honeymoon, their wedding planner decided to take all the beautiful flowers from the reception tables and distribute them among patients at a local hospice—a beautiful and compassionate gesture that brightened the day for the hospice staff, as well. Thus the love celebrated at one intimate ceremony spilled over into a larger world, touching the lives of even strangers. That’s the great gift that is love, and when we receive it, it’s as if the entire universe pauses for a moment to bask in it.
I often draw on my memories of that wedding weekend and the hope and comfort they give me about our capacity to love. I needed that hope and comfort so much a few weeks ago when I read a story about another couple that broke my heart. I didn’t know them, but they easily could have been neighbors or friends of mine. They were the parents of three adopted children, and in 2007, the entire family was about to depart for a cruise from Miami when the mother fell ill. She was rushed to a hospital, where she was admitted.
This is when the real nightmare began.
The hospital refused to take medical information from the woman’s partner because the partner was also female. According to a hospital spokesperson, they were in “an antigay city and state,” and the woman’s partner and children would receive no information about the patient’s medical condition, nor would they be allowed to see her. The partner managed to contact people in their home state who were able to fax all the legal documentation that unmarried couples put in place to protect them from just such an ordeal—including the medical power of attorney.
A medical power of attorney is a document that will allow any person so designated by the patient legal rights regarding medical decisions, but it was not honored by this Miami hospital. As the patient slipped into a coma and eventually died, her partner was allowed only a five-minute visit while a priest was present to administer the sacrament of anointing of the sick.
The patient’s doctor admitted there was no reason why her family shouldn’t see the dying woman. No reason except the cruelest kind of bigotry. Even after her death, when the family returned home, the county refused to release the death certificate to her partner because they weren’t married.
I’ve been present at the deaths of five people I loved. Those hours, even minutes, before and when someone dies are profound. The words, the touches, the gestures we use to comfort and express our love as we say goodbye are sacred. I can’t imagine being in a situation in which my husband would be only a few feet from me, his life slipping away, and being forbidden to be at his side. Even thinking of that makes me cry. But it wouldn’t happen. If it were physically possible for me to be with him, no doctor, nurse, social worker, or hospital administrator would block my way. Nor was I, as a daughter, kept away from my parents during their hospitalizations, and I was with my mother when she died. Custom, the law, the very essence of human kindness protect me from the agony of being kept from a family member who’s dying.
But custom, the law, and human kindness didn’t protect those two women in Miami. And my friends, the Jewish couple? They wouldn’t have been protected either, had they ended up at that Miami hospital before taking their honeymoon trip to Jamaica. Because though their families and friends witnessed their wedding ceremony, and though their rabbi blessed their union, they also are both women. There is no civil law that honors their commitment to each other.
So please don’t tell me that the bigotry that overturns or denies protections and equal rights to gays and lesbians in places like California and Maine doesn’t affect me. It does. And please don’t tell me how you really do love your gay friends, but you think that “marriage is between one man and one woman,” because as far as I’m concerned, that isn’t love. I’ve never yet been told of one single incident in which a minister or priest or pastor was forced to marry any couple that he or she didn’t feel comfortable marrying. This isn’t about religion. This is about civil law, and treating all people with equality and dignity.
When you tell me that my gay and lesbian friends and family members don’t deserve to be married, don’t deserve to be part of decisions regarding their spouses’ medical care, don’t deserve to stand by their spouses’ hospital beds as they’re dying to say that last goodbye, don’t deserve to live full lives without fear of being denied the most basic respect and rights a marriage bestows, then you’re saying the power of love to build and sustain us as individuals, families, and communities doesn’t deserve to exist.
And you are wrong.
I’m sure everyone will be relieved that I’m not going to jump on my soapbox about climate change. Those who read my LJ already have their opinions on it–both agreeing with and disagreeing with mine. However, October 15 has been designated Blog Action Day on Climate Change, in anticipation of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen from December 7 to December 18. So I decided to share a couple of photos of an area that fascinated me in 1998 when Tom and I drove from California to Texas.
Be kind to our planet; it’s the only one we have now. There are always ways we can do better personally, including some suggested right here.
I feel like being cantankerous today. So here we go:
1. Members of national assemblies and governments of states;
2. Members of international courts;
3. University rectors; professors of social sciences, history, philosophy, law and theology; directors of peace research institutes and foreign policy institutes;
4. Persons who have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize;
5. Board members of organizations who have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize;
6. Active and former members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee; (proposals by members of the Committee to be submitted no later than at the first meeting of the Committee after February 1) and
7. Former advisers appointed by the Norwegian Nobel Institute.
Just seconds away from shutting down my laptop and going to bed, I decided to read one more news article. My eyes were drawn to the top of the screen to an ad for Stacy’s Chips. Some of you may remember this post back in April, when I ranted about the incorrect use of an apostrophe in “its.” Internet, LOOK!
They fixed it! In gratitude, I will soon buy my first bag of Stacy’s Chips.
Who knows; maybe this will even cure my insomnia. Good night!
The other day I read the following quote from Kanye West: I am a proud non-reader of books. I like to get information from doing stuff like actually talking to people and living real life.
And even though I think that’s one of the lamest statements ever (I don’t care if he doesn’t read, but I’m pretty sure there are plenty of readers who are living real lives and who actually talk to people), what really set my teeth on edge was the predictable response: WHAT MESSAGE IS HE SENDING TO THE CHILDREN?
Parents, if your children are getting their life lessons from Kanye West, you have beyond failed them anyway. Just go ahead and drive with them on your lap and dangle them off a balcony, too.
Last September, I posted about how I mislaid all the notes I’d made for a third Coventry book. It wasn’t so much plot details that I was frustrated to lose, it was all my character names and descriptions. Ultimately, I got the proposal together so I could submit it to my agent and publisher. My editor turned it down–blah blah blah–I’m over that.
I’d started writing a non-Coventry novel on my desktop, for which I made copious notes about place names and details and people names and descriptions in a document that lived on my laptop. I’ve gotten to a point where I need those notes–and THERE’S NO SUCH DOCUMENT! I’ve done electronic searches on both computers using key words and phrases–but in the wee hours of the morning, I had to accept it. Somehow, I managed to delete it.
Unless–CONFESS! Which one of you is gaslighting me?
To relax myself so some of those lost details could crawl to shore from my brain swamp, I dragged out a 1964 Simplicity pattern and made Christina Aguilera a new dress. Her name isn’t going to stay Christina Aguilera. Do you think she looks like a very special TV character named Blossom? Tom does. From certain angles, she also looks like Sarah Jessica Parker. No way am I naming her Blossom, but I could name her Jess after a character in Three Fortunes in One Cookie (female, though she was named for my by-choice-nephew Jess), or I could name her Sarah for SJP and my niece, although my niece is way prettier than this doll–and prettier than SJP, for that matter.
Or I could pretend I’m Janet Evanovich, only instead of letting y’all compete to name my next book, you can name my doll with a prize to be determined. Maybe I could name a character after YOU in my next book.
Um…what was your name again?
Today on someone’s Web site I saw a banner ad for Stacy’s Pita Chips. They look like they’d be delicious. Unfortunately, I’m currently blinded by apostrophury.
They are saying: “It is art at it is crunchiest.” Catchy slogan.
This almost rouses me to cast off my slugitude, but I don’t want to rush things. In a comment to one of my posts, Jen sent me a link to an article about a West Virginia legislator (Democratic Delegate Jeff Eldridge) who wants to outlaw Barbies in the state because he says the doll’s emphasis on beauty over intellect is bad for girls.
I was going to respond in comments, but in honor of Barbie’s upcoming fiftieth birthday, I figure she deserves her own post. So, my thoughts (without bashing Eldridge or West Virginia, because I think that’s unproductive):
Don’t hate Barbie because she’s beautiful! She’s also smart. She knows how to change with the times. She’s had every possible career: model, doctor, astronaut, soldier, veterinarian, nurse, political candidate, princess, secretary, athlete, singer, girlfriend, journalist, dog groomer, cheerleader, mermaid, naturalist.
Why is it always toys perceived as “for girls” that everybody frets about, e.g., Barbies lower their self-esteem, or Easy-Bake Ovens or My First Sewing Machines trap girls in traditional gender roles?
Why does no one say that boys are set up to fail in life by “for boys” toys because they can’t live up to GI Joe’s physical appearance, or they’ll grow up to discover that they’re unable to spin webs and leap from building to building and save the world like Spiderman, or even sometimes not have the right stuff to get a job driving a dump truck or racing a car or being a railroad engineer or a fireman?
Why does conventional wisdom assume that boys are just having fun and know the difference between play and reality, whereas poor girls don’t get that concept so end up huddled in a corner feeling inadequate and popping Valium because they aren’t built to Barbie scale? THAT assumption, to me, is more demeaning than being given a pretty doll who is forever tiptoeing into her next adventure.
And seriously, I doubt I ever knew a single female who asked for this hairstyle or made wearing this dress her life’s ambition.